Communities for Children Facilitating Partners Evidence-based programme profiles

Parents Under Pressure (PuP)

Name

Parents Under Pressure (PuP)

Target audience

Infants (0-2 years)
Early childhood (3-5 years)
Middle childhood (6-12 years)
Parents
At-risk or vulnerable

CfC Objective

Healthy Young Families
Supporting Families and Parents

Organisation

Parents under Pressure

Delivery Setting

Home-based and residential treatment settings

Description

Individualised home-visiting, case-management program designed for families where there are multiple issues that impact on family functioning such as depression, anxiety, substance misuse, family violence, financial stress, and where there is a high risk of child maltreatment. Mindfulness techniques are used to improve parental emotional regulation. These, combined with emotional availability constructs, are used to support or enhance the carer/parent-child relationship to promote a nurturing environment and thus improve child self-regulation. The PuP program is individualised to suit the needs of each family with supporting materials to help put PuP into practice.

Delivered to

Families expecting a child, infants and children up to eight years with multiple risk factors; current or potential involvement with child protection, in kinship or foster care; parents are in residential treatment facilities.

Delivered by

Family support practitioners, social workers, psychologists.

Program Structure

PuP is underpinned by the PuP Integrated Theoretical Framework that draws from developmental psychopathology and attachment theory. This provides a framework to develop individualised family support plans tailored to each family. A Parent Workbook contains 12 modules that can be used to support the delivery of the family support plan. The program can be delivered in flexible formats and duration depending on the needs of the family.
PuP practitioners have access to an Online Tool Kit that provides (i) standardized measures, scoring and feedback/interpretation to guide use the use of PuP and (ii) goal setting and goal attainment forms (iii) resources and links to other relevant websites. It is possible to use these measures for service evaluation with a specific report based on 12 months of data available on request.

Training

Practitioners must undergo training and supervision with an accredited PuP Trainer. This involves a combination of training/implementation support on PuP theoretical principles (2 consecutive days) and implementation support across 12 months (3 case review days; one development day) to provide the opportunity to embed the PuP program and principles into practice. Accreditation is provided following completion of a case study and demonstrated competency of the assessment process with 3 families. The program is disseminated by Griffith University and a “Badge of Accreditation” is provided by Griffith University:

http://www.pupprogram.net.au/media/9319/training%20overview.pdf

Cost
  • $3000 for training and clinical supervision per practitioner.
  • $2000 for training as a PuP Supervisor.
  • Costs for training a practitioner will be reduced to $1500 if the agency has a trained supervisor.
  • Larger scale training price will be provided on application.
Contact

Phone: Prof. Sharon Dawe - (07) 3875 3371
Email: s.dawe@griffith.edu.au, p.harnett@psy.uq.edu.au
Website: http://www.pupprogram.net.au

Evaluation and effectiveness

Three pre-post case study series (Dawe et al., 2003; Frye & Dawe, 2008; Hartnett et al, 2007); Australian RCT of families engaged in methadone treatment (Dawe & Harnett, 2007), a feasibility study of the PuP program for families with a child with FASD (2017), high risk pregnant women (Harnett et al, 2018); UK RCT of families engaged in community-based addiction services (Barlow et al., 2019).

Findings include:

  • reduction in child abuse potential;
  • significant improvements in parental functioning, parent-child relationships;
  • reduction in parental stress, rigid parenting attitudes and child behaviour problems;
  • reduction in parental substance abuse and risk behavior.

In a cost effectiveness study (Dalziel et al., 2015), the cost per expected case of child maltreatment prevented was calculated and compared with the estimated lifetime costs of maltreatment. Based on the assumption that 20 out of 100 families would be diverted from the child protection system, a net present value saving of an estimated AU$3.1 million (£1.7 million) would be made.

Dawe, S., Harnett, P., Rendalls, V., and Staiger, P. (2003). Improving family functioning and child outcome in methadone maintained families: the Parents under Pressure program. Drug and Alcohol Review, 22(3), 299-307.

Dawe S., & Harnett, P. (2007). Reducing potential for child abuse among methadone-maintained parents: results from a randomized controlled trial, Journal of Substance Abuse and Treatment, 32(4), 226-235.

Dalziel. K., Dawe, S., Harnett, H., & Segal, L. (2015). Cost-effectiveness analysis of the parents under pressure program for methadone-maintained parents. Child Abuse Review. DOI: 10.1002/car.2371

Reid, N., Dawe, S., Harnett, P. Shelton, D., Hutton, l., O'Callaghan, F., (2017) Feasibility Study of a Family-Focused Intervention to Improve Outcomes for Children with FASD. Research in Developmental Disabilities

Harnett, P., Barlow, J., Dawe., S., Coe, C., and Newbold, C. (2018). Assessing capacity to change in high-risk pregnant women. Child Abuse Review. DOI: 10.1002/car.249

Barlow, J., Sembi, S., Parsons, H., Sungwook, K., Petrou, S., Harnett, P., Dawe, S. (2019). A randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation of the Parents under Pressure Program for parents in substance abuse treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 194;184-194: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.08.044